It's only a million degrees, not nearly hot enough, to say nothing of the i sweep registration density.
Do Better diligence so I don't have to come back and defend my honor from all your dishonorable lies.
Protoplasmix 3 / 5 (5) Oct 18, 2014 For example, write a computer program that can react to the unexpected.
"You merely confirm I am right " No I don't, what I wrote confirms nothing of the sort and simply stating that it does is spurious.Please" me and provide a link to the source so I can verify that you can read, thanks f unfortunately for you.The FDA blah blah blah (See above) Rossi is under no obligation to disclose the ingredients this is true, but as soon as someone gets one apart there will be info.The confusion from granules to sunspots reminds me of an article I read.But whatever it is, it must not be coal.TheGhostofOtto1923.2 / 5 (9) Oct 19, 2014 The automation could not have solved those problems, and that's due to its limitations No, automation is used because people are incapable of acting quickly or dependably enough to prevent problems.We found that.92 of initial U is converted into fissile Pu by our suggested fusion reactor with thermal power of 3000.Null readings for any radiation whatsoever (alpha, beta, gamma, or even neutrons) from the fuel/reactor before, during and after the test is quite amazing.You see it through the eyes of someone taught ideal MHD models.This combined with fusion reactors using easier-to-fuse isotopes instead of bare protons means that the iter is expected to produce 500 MW in 840 cubic meter of plasma, or600,000 Watts per cubic meter.They are brute physical facts we can observe directly without equipment.On the other hand it could just be that he's bracque I'm sure all will be revealed when the ToE is published, hahahahahahahaha, that ToE claim just makes me laugh!Congratulations to all of them!That was the overall context for everything (including 'current 'spin being discussed in abstractions terms, and hence at cross/vague purposes, until identified/explained in real energy-space terms.You're going to preprogram that?This is usually called "changing the subject." the waste kept generating heat, and eventually hydrogen The waste heat didn't create the hydrogen.You are on the way to being a great scientist if you learn your lessons from mistakes while others do not.Drop it now bfore you embarrass yourself and your troll mates who fell for it like self-serving elitist suckers not objective scientists.
You're committing a fallacy: special pleading.
Say, I guess you missed the publication of rossis 3rd party peer-reviewed report today?